What Inventors and Patent Valuation Professionals Should Know About AI
$295
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116.
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1534 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
- Microsoft Corp. v. i41 Ltd. P’ship, 564 U.S. 91 (2011).
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 40 F.3d 1223, 1227-1228, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp., 155 F.3d 1344, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
- Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 573 U.S. 208, 2016 (2014).
What is the impact of Rule 56 on AI inventorship? What should you know about intellectual
The instructor walks the listeners through an inventorship case study and provides lists of red flags to be aware of as well as constructive claims terms. If you don’t know the answers to questions such as these, you really should listen to this timely webinar:
- What are the three Pannu factors of inventorship?
- What is the impact of Rule 56 on AI inventorship? What should you know about intellectual domination?
- How has the Chevron standard changed with respect to AI and Inventorship?
- How can AI models destroy novelty?
- How might AI threaten attorney-client privilege?
- Is the USPTO issuing patents that will be struck down (based on 101 concerns) when enforced? How will the Desjardins decision magnify/mitigate that risk?
- How does AI lead to the proliferation of prior art (including defensive publication)?
- To what extent can AI lead to faster and higher levels of patent assertion?
- Which patent classifications have the highest risk of 101 validity?
- What are some AI novelty-related red flags in claims?
- Why should a patent valuation analyst review prompt/output logs and inventor notebooks?
Course Leader: Gerard Reinhardt, Founding Partner, Reinhardt IP, PA.
Mr. Reinhardt has over twenty-five years of experience focused on intellectual property and technology law. Mr. Reinhardt has experience in litigating large, complex patent matters for such clients as IBM, Exxon, and Bombardier in federal district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the International Trade Commission with a storied NY intellectual property law firm (Morgan & Finnegan).
Mr. Reinhardt also has experience in managing a broad portfolio of intellectual property matters as in-house counsel with branded pharmaceutical corporations (Schering-Plough and Merck). Duties included patent application drafting, filing and prosecution, due diligence, licensing, and, Hatch-Waxman matters. Mr. Reinhardt possesses Law Licenses in FL, NY, TX, DC, & US Patent & Trademark Office. Mr. Reinhardt has 15 years of experience as an engineer with Raytheon (prior to starting the practice of law), working on such projects as the B-1 and B-52 bombers, the F-35, and the Space Shuttle Main Engine Turbopump, as well as running hazard analyses in large petrochemical plants.